How it works

From PasswordMaker

Revision as of 21:20, 7 September 2007 by Tanstaafl (Talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search

You provide PasswordMaker at least two pieces of information: a master password -- that one, favorite password you like -- and the URL of the website requiring a password. For internet applications without URLs, such as instant messaging, you can make up any text string you like, e.g., "", or "my-aol-im").

Through the magic of your favorite one-way hash algorithm (Passwordmaker currently supports all of these), PasswordMaker uses the master password and the URL (or the text string) that you provided, plus the account settings as modified by you, to calculate what is known as a digital fingerprint - or hash - which can then be used as your password for the website.

Although one-way hash algorithms have a number of interesting characteristics, the one capitalized on by PasswordMaker is that the resulting hash (password) "does not reveal anything about the input (your master password) that was used to generate it.[1]"

In other words, if someone has one or more of your generated passwords, it is computationally infeasible for him to derive your master password or to calculate your other passwords. Computationally infeasible means even computers like this won't help!

Security features offered by the Browser Extension version of PasswordMaker - such as the ability to automatically insert both usernames and the generated passwords into a web sites' username and password fields, helps protect you from key-loggers and/or trojan horses that some "Black Hats" use to try to steal passwords. For more details, visit the FAQ.

What About Portability?

For times when you must use an unsupported browser or can't install the extension for some other reason, there's an online version which mimicks the extension and works in all browsers new and old. No downloads or installations are required.

Additionally, there is a stand-alone version for Windows, Linux and Mac desktops, as well as a command-line version that can be integrated with custom applications.

Lastly, there is a J2ME version in the works for mobile phones and PDAs, although there is little happening at the moment. If you are interested in seeing this implemented more quickly and are willing to sponsor its development, please add a post in the user forums and someone will get in touch with you to discuss terms.

Personal tools

Donations / Expenses