Talk:Main Page - Revision history

Miquelfire: Forgot sig

2007-07-02T17:02:52Z

Forgot sig

Miquelfire: /* Layout good? */

2007-07-02T17:02:34Z

Layout good?

Miquelfire: /* Layout good? */

2007-06-22T01:54:52Z

Layout good?

Miquelfire: /* Migrate the entire site to the wiki? */

2007-06-22T00:32:55Z

Migrate the entire site to the wiki?

Eric H. Jung: /* Migrate the entire site to the wiki? */

2007-06-21T04:01:43Z

Migrate the entire site to the wiki?

Eric H. Jung: /* Layout good? */

2007-06-21T04:01:27Z

Layout good?

Eric H. Jung: /* Layout good? */

2007-06-21T04:00:51Z

Layout good?

Miquelfire: Forgot sig

2007-06-21T02:12:06Z

Forgot sig

Miquelfire at 02:11, 21 June 2007

2007-06-21T02:11:44Z

Eric H. Jung: /* Layout good? */

2007-06-21T01:47:33Z

Layout good?

@@ Line 8: / Line 8: @@
 Thinking about it, using a complex layout when we don't have much in the wiki is not a good idea. I say we just use a simple list instead until we have enough content to warrant a layout like we have now. --[[User:Miquelfire|Miquel Fire]] 01:54, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
-: Yea, got rid of the tables. As more pages are created, I'll add the important ones on the front page.
+: Yea, got rid of the tables. As more pages are created, I'll add the important ones on the front page. --[[User:Miquelfire|Miquel Fire]] 17:02, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
 == Migrate the entire site to the wiki? ==

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 == Layout good? ==
 Anyone who doesn't like the layout here? Know how to make it better? --[[User:Miquelfire|Miquel Fire]] 00:34, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
 : BTW, using :'s before a line indents it. So we can have threaded discussions --[[User:Miquelfire|Miquel Fire]] 00:34, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
 :: Looks good. We do, of course, need a section for "Help" or "Manuals" (maybe we'll add a page or two for the non-Firefox editions as time permits). I don't think we need the profiles section so prominent; i.e., we don't need our names/nicks on the front page of this thing. Let's be humble :)
 Thinking about it, using a complex layout when we don't have much in the wiki is not a good idea. I say we just use a simple list instead until we have enough content to warrant a layout like we have now. --[[User:Miquelfire|Miquel Fire]] 01:54, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
 == Migrate the entire site to the wiki? ==

@@ Line 3: / Line 3: @@
 : BTW, using :'s before a line indents it. So we can have threaded discussions --[[User:Miquelfire|Miquel Fire]] 00:34, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
 :: Looks good. We do, of course, need a section for "Help" or "Manuals" (maybe we'll add a page or two for the non-Firefox editions as time permits). I don't think we need the profiles section so prominent; i.e., we don't need our names/nicks on the front page of this thing. Let's be humble :)
 == Migrate the entire site to the wiki? ==

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:32, 22 June 2007
Line 8:		Line 8:
	: Well, the online edition can't really be here I think. But otherwise, I could see the complete site being moved here. Though, it's odd to have the main site at wiki.passwordmaker.org --[[User:Miquelfire\|Miquel Fire]] 02:12, 21 June 2007 (UTC)		: Well, the online edition can't really be here I think. But otherwise, I could see the complete site being moved here. Though, it's odd to have the main site at wiki.passwordmaker.org --[[User:Miquelfire\|Miquel Fire]] 02:12, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
	:: Don't worry about the URL for now... we can always change that. We should probably leave all the downloads on SF, and if we're really serious about moving it then I can host the online edition, too, or we can leave that on SF... doesn't matter. But the question is, should we do this? --[[User:Eric H. Jung\|Eric H. Jung]] 04:00, 21 June 2007 (UTC)		:: Don't worry about the URL for now... we can always change that. We should probably leave all the downloads on SF, and if we're really serious about moving it then I can host the online edition, too, or we can leave that on SF... doesn't matter. But the question is, should we do this? --[[User:Eric H. Jung\|Eric H. Jung]] 04:00, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
		+	::: Need the others to tell confirm or deny. --[[User:Miquelfire\|Miquel Fire]] 00:32, 22 June 2007 (UTC)

@@ Line 6: / Line 6: @@
 == Migrate the entire site to the wiki? ==
 Maybe we should just move the entire website here... losing all the pretty CSS and graphics, of course. What do you think? --[[User:Eric H. Jung|Eric H. Jung]] 01:47, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
-::: Well, the online edition can't really be here I think. But otherwise, I could see the complete site being moved here. Though, it's odd to have the main site at wiki.passwordmaker.org --[[User:Miquelfire|Miquel Fire]] 02:12, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
+: Well, the online edition can't really be here I think. But otherwise, I could see the complete site being moved here. Though, it's odd to have the main site at wiki.passwordmaker.org --[[User:Miquelfire|Miquel Fire]] 02:12, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
-:::: Don't worry about the URL for now... we can always change that. We should probably leave all the downloads on SF, and if we're really serious about moving it then I can host the online edition, too, or we can leave that on SF... doesn't matter. But the question is, should we do this? --[[User:Eric H. Jung|Eric H. Jung]] 04:00, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
+:: Don't worry about the URL for now... we can always change that. We should probably leave all the downloads on SF, and if we're really serious about moving it then I can host the online edition, too, or we can leave that on SF... doesn't matter. But the question is, should we do this? --[[User:Eric H. Jung|Eric H. Jung]] 04:00, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:00, 21 June 2007
Line 4:		Line 4:
	:: Looks good. We do, of course, need a section for "Help" or "Manuals" (maybe we'll add a page or two for the non-Firefox editions as time permits). I don't think we need the profiles section so prominent; i.e., we don't need our names/nicks on the front page of this thing. Let's be humble :) Maybe we should just move the entire website here... losing all the pretty CSS and graphics, of course. What do you think? --[[User:Eric H. Jung\|Eric H. Jung]] 01:47, 21 June 2007 (UTC)		:: Looks good. We do, of course, need a section for "Help" or "Manuals" (maybe we'll add a page or two for the non-Firefox editions as time permits). I don't think we need the profiles section so prominent; i.e., we don't need our names/nicks on the front page of this thing. Let's be humble :) Maybe we should just move the entire website here... losing all the pretty CSS and graphics, of course. What do you think? --[[User:Eric H. Jung\|Eric H. Jung]] 01:47, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
	::: Well, the online edition can't really be here I think. But otherwise, I could see the complete site being moved here. Though, it's odd to have the main site at wiki.passwordmaker.org --[[User:Miquelfire\|Miquel Fire]] 02:12, 21 June 2007 (UTC)		::: Well, the online edition can't really be here I think. But otherwise, I could see the complete site being moved here. Though, it's odd to have the main site at wiki.passwordmaker.org --[[User:Miquelfire\|Miquel Fire]] 02:12, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
		+	:::: Don't worry about the URL for now... we can always change that. We should probably leave all the downloads on SF, and if we're really serious about moving it then I can host the online edition, too, or we can leave that on SF... doesn't matter. But the question is, should we do this? --[[User:Eric H. Jung\|Eric H. Jung]] 04:00, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:11, 21 June 2007
Line 3:		Line 3:
	: BTW, using :'s before a line indents it. So we can have threaded discussions --[[User:Miquelfire\|Miquel Fire]] 00:34, 21 June 2007 (UTC)		: BTW, using :'s before a line indents it. So we can have threaded discussions --[[User:Miquelfire\|Miquel Fire]] 00:34, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
	:: Looks good. We do, of course, need a section for "Help" or "Manuals" (maybe we'll add a page or two for the non-Firefox editions as time permits). I don't think we need the profiles section so prominent; i.e., we don't need our names/nicks on the front page of this thing. Let's be humble :) Maybe we should just move the entire website here... losing all the pretty CSS and graphics, of course. What do you think? --[[User:Eric H. Jung\|Eric H. Jung]] 01:47, 21 June 2007 (UTC)		:: Looks good. We do, of course, need a section for "Help" or "Manuals" (maybe we'll add a page or two for the non-Firefox editions as time permits). I don't think we need the profiles section so prominent; i.e., we don't need our names/nicks on the front page of this thing. Let's be humble :) Maybe we should just move the entire website here... losing all the pretty CSS and graphics, of course. What do you think? --[[User:Eric H. Jung\|Eric H. Jung]] 01:47, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
		+	::: Well, the online edition can't really be here I think. But otherwise, I could see the complete site being moved here. Though, it's odd to have the main site at wiki.passwordmaker.org

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:47, 21 June 2007
Line 2:		Line 2:
	Anyone who doesn't like the layout here? Know how to make it better? --[[User:Miquelfire\|Miquel Fire]] 00:34, 21 June 2007 (UTC)		Anyone who doesn't like the layout here? Know how to make it better? --[[User:Miquelfire\|Miquel Fire]] 00:34, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
	: BTW, using :'s before a line indents it. So we can have threaded discussions --[[User:Miquelfire\|Miquel Fire]] 00:34, 21 June 2007 (UTC)		: BTW, using :'s before a line indents it. So we can have threaded discussions --[[User:Miquelfire\|Miquel Fire]] 00:34, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
		+	:: Looks good. We do, of course, need a section for "Help" or "Manuals" (maybe we'll add a page or two for the non-Firefox editions as time permits). I don't think we need the profiles section so prominent; i.e., we don't need our names/nicks on the front page of this thing. Let's be humble :) Maybe we should just move the entire website here... losing all the pretty CSS and graphics, of course. What do you think? --[[User:Eric H. Jung\|Eric H. Jung]] 01:47, 21 June 2007 (UTC)